WHEN IS IT LEGAL FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ICE or HLS, TO ARREST AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT

1.When is legal for the Federal Government by ICE or HLS to Arrest an illegal immigrant.

 

 

2.INTRODUCTION

 

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), lawfully apprehended the Respondent, an undocumented alien present in the United States without lawful status, based on probable cause that Respondent posed a threat to public safety and was removable under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The Respondent has a documented history of criminal activity, including [e.g., felony conviction, gang affiliation, or violent conduct], making the arrest not only lawful but necessary to protect the community.             

 

3.ARGUMENT

 

4. ICE Possesses Statutory Authority to Arrest Removable Aliens

 

4(A)Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2), ICE officers are authorized to:

"...arrest any alien in the United States if the officer has reason to believe that the alien is in the United States in violation of any law or regulation and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained for his arrest."

 

The Respondent, an undocumented immigrant, is inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i) and removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B). These provisions clearly grant ICE the authority to detain and initiate removal proceedings.

 

4(B). The Arrest Was Based on Probable Cause and Respondent’s Criminal Conduct

 

Probable cause existed for the arrest, based on:

- Information that the Respondent lacked valid immigration documentation;

- A prior [e.g., felony conviction for assault, DUI, drug trafficking];

- Verified information from local law enforcement or a national database (NCIC, IDENT, etc.);

- Evidence of gang or cartel affiliation (if applicable).

In United States v. Olivares-Rangel, 458 F.3d 1104 (10th Cir. 2006), the court held that immigration arrests are lawful if supported by probable cause and executed under statutory authority. Here, ICE acted fully within legal limits.

 

4 (C). There Was No Constitutional Violation

 

ICE officers conducted the arrest in accordance with Fourth Amendment standards, including:

- No unreasonable search or seizure;

- No use of excessive force;

- Arrest conducted in a public place or pursuant to valid administrative warrant.

Under INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984), civil immigration enforcement actions do not trigger the same exclusionary rule protections as criminal proceedings unless there is egregious conduct—which is not alleged or evidenced here.                                             11

 

4 (D). Public Safety Justifies Detention Pending Proceedings

 

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c), ICE is required to detain certain categories of aliens, including those convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude, controlled substances, or crimes of violence. The Respondent falls within these categories.

Given the Respondent’s background, their continued presence in the community poses an unacceptable risk, justifying detention without bond pending resolution of removal proceedings.

 

5.CONCLUSION

 

The arrest and detention of the Respondent were entirely lawful under federal immigration law and constitutional principles. ICE officers acted within their legal authority and in the interest of public safety.

 

6.If an Employer has any issues regarding the arrest of one of your employees since they were an illegal immigrant which might violate the NLRB Act as well,  or any other labor relations issue at the NLRB, please contact Sanford Rudnick JD At 1-800-326-3046 sandy@rudnickpro.com or www.Theunionexpert.com


Fundamentals of Labor Law



Sanford Rudnick has written a book called Fundamentals of Labor Law which helps Employers practice at the NLRB. He has used this book for over 40 years.

 

Sanford Rudnick has gotten this book into many law schools around the country such as Harvard and USC Law School.

 

Also, Sanford Rudnick has gotten other books on Resolution of Conflict into the Library of Congress and many other libraries around the world.

 

The major problem in any election or an unfair labor practice charge, is how to resolve conflict between management and your employees. In fact, according to the NLRB there is an 16% increase in unfair labor practices charges being filed by employees or unions in 2023.

 

Sanford Rudnick uses these principles in these books to win elections and to resolve charge at the NLRB. Call H. Sanford

Rudnick & Associates to purchase these books at

1-800-326-3046.


Learn More

IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE IN CONDUCTING AN ELECTION MEETING, PLEASE CALL:

H. Sanford Rudnick JD: 1 800-326-3046

H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates is a full-service Labor Relations firm with 40 years of experience in negotiating union contracts, NLRB matters and all human resource matters. In fact, Mr. Rudnick has written a book called "Fundamentals of Labor Law Regarding Unions" which includes a summary on the National Labor Relations Board and Unions which is at Harvard Law School Library and other law schools around the country. Call to purchase your copy at for $29.95 800.326.3046.


We step in when your business demands your attention or when the unions or the laws or rules of the any of the following threaten the success or profitability of your business. 


National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

Employee Motivation

Wage and Hour Surveys

Union elections

Collective bargaining

negotiations

Decertifications

The need for union avoidance


Always Here to Help!


If my firm, H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates, can be of assistance to you concerning an election,

an unfair labor practice, negotiations, your unfunded pension liability

or any other human resource matter, please contact me immediately to schedule a free telephone consultation.


Respectfully,


H. Sanford Rudnick, J.D.

Labor Consultant

800.326.3046 

sandy@rudnickpro.com

www.theunionexpert.com


Website                    Our Results                    Publications                    Client List                    Human Resources

GET IN TOUCH!


H. Sanford Rudnick and Associates

300 South 4th Street, 6th Floor,

Las Vegas, NV 89101


1717 K St. NW S900J

Washington DC 20006

745 5th Ave. 8500

NY, NY 10151


1990 No. California Blvd. S830,

Walnut Creek, Ca 94596

Direct Line - 925-256-0660

Cell Phone - 925-352-7900



Sandy Rudnick

sandy@rudnickpro.com 


By Design Team May 6, 2025
1. An Employer can Install Cameras into their Trucks Without bargaining with the Union. 2. If a union that does not have any language in their contract about installation of cameras, it allows an Employer to install cameras into their trucks for safety purposes pursuant to its management rights clause. 3. The Employer cannot install cameras for union surveillance or monitoring of the employees which is a violation of the NLRB Act. 4. The installation of the cameras must be for strictly safety purposes. 5. Clear and Unmistakable Waiver: Employers need to ensure any waivers of bargaining rights related to camera installation are explicit and unambiguous. 6. If an Employer has any issues installing cameras into their trucks without bargaining with the union or any other labor relations issue at the NLRB, please contact Sanford Rudnick JD At 1-800-326-3046 sandy@rudnickpro.com or www.Theunionexpert.com
April 17, 2025
In the U.S., employers can generally require employees to get vaccinated against COVID-19, but there are important exceptions and limitations: 1. Medical and Religious Exemptions – Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, employees may request exemptions for medical reasons or sincerely held religious beliefs. Employers must provide reasonable accommodations unless it creates an undue hardship. 2. State and Local Laws – Some states have passed laws that limit or prohibit employer vaccine mandates, especially for private employers. 3. Union and Employment Contracts – If an employee is covered by a union agreement or employment contract, the terms of that agreement may impact whether a vaccine mandate is enforceable. 4. At-Will Employment – In most states, employment is "at-will," meaning an employer can terminate employees who refuse a vaccine (except where exemptions apply). 5. Industry-Specific Rules – Healthcare facilities and government contractors may have different rules due to federal regulations. 6.If an Employer has any issues with requiring employees to get covid tests or any other labor relations issue at the NLRB, please contact Sanford Rudnick JD At 1-800-323046, sandy@rudnickpro.com or www.Theunionexpert.com
April 17, 2025
The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.
By Design Team March 26, 2025
March 24, 2025 1. As you know every week, H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates tells Employers what the NLRB had ruled with my firms current cases. 2. This week I wanted to explain when a Whistleblower/employee files a complaint at the NLRB. 3. A Whistleblower is someone who reports illegal, unethical, or improper activities within an organization. This could include fraud, corruption, safety violations, or other misconduct. Whistleblowers can be employees, contractors, or even outsiders who have knowledge of wrongdoing. 4. Depending on the situation, whistleblowers may report to authorities such as government agencies, regulators, or the media. In many countries, there are laws that protect whistleblowers from retaliation, such as being fired or harassed for speaking out. 5. A whistleblower who was terminated for reporting labor law violations to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) may be entitled to remedies under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) . The NLRB protects employees from retaliation for engaging in protected concerted activity , including whistleblowing on unfair labor practices. 6. Potential Remedies for a Wrongfully Terminated Whistleblower: Reinstatement – The employee may be reinstated to their former position if the NLRB determines the termination was unlawful. Back Pay – Compensation for lost wages and benefits due to wrongful termination. Front Pay – If reinstatement isn’t feasible, the employee may receive compensation for future lost earnings. Expungement of Disciplinary Records – Any references to the wrongful termination may be removed from the employee's record. Cease and Desist Orders – The employer may be ordered to stop retaliatory practices. Notice Posting – The employer might be required to post a notice informing employees of their rights and the violation committed. Other Make-Whole Relief – This could include damages for harm suffered due to the retaliation. 8. If an Employer has any problems with a Whistleblower /employee in general or any other labor relations issue, please contact Sanford Rudnick JD At 1-800-326-3046, sandy@rudnickpro.com or www.Theunionexpert.com
March 11, 2025
March 10, 2025 Hood River Distillers v. NLRB (DC Cir 03/07/2025) http://case.lawmemo.com/dc/hood.pdf 1.The Court of Appeals enforced an NLRB order that held that the employer had unilaterally changed employment terms even though there was no impasse in negotiations. 2.During lengthy negotiations, the employer several times said they were at impasse, yet bargaining continued. 3.In the end, the employer recognized that the parties had made headway and said it had more room to give. Thus, the employer was not at impasse to implement the new terms and conditions. 4.If you need assistance in negotiations when you can implement your final proposal and you are at impasse, please contact H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates at 1-800-326-3046
By Design Team March 4, 2025
LIFE VISION CONFLICT RESOLUTION
By Design Team February 26, 2025
February 25, 2025 How to Resolve an Employer’s Unfunded Pension Liability (UPL) 1 If an Employer has a union contract and either sells, goes out of business, or retires, it might have an unexpected unfunded pension liability (UPL) if they have a union defined benefit pension plan. 2. An Employer should write a letter to the Union pension plan a least one year in advance to determine if they have an UPL before they discontinue their Business. 3. If the Employer does have an UPL to the Pension Trust, it is best to resolve the UPL with a written settlement. There are many circumstances where an Employer MAY not have to pay his UPL. 4. The pension trust and Employer can enter into a settlement to reduce their UPL where the Employer can remit a lump sum payment to the Trust Fund for a reduced amount. 5. If the Employer cannot enter into a settlement to resolve their UPL then the parties can enter into a 20 Year Agreement to pay off their UPL. 6. If your company needs assistance in reducing your unfunded pension liability with your union, please contact H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates at 1-800-326-3046
By Design Team February 18, 2025
February 18, 2025 When an employer decides to cease operations shortly after a union election petition is filed, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) scrutinizes the employer's motives to determine if the action was intended to interfere with employees' organizing rights. The employer bears the burden of providing substantial and credible evidence that the decision to cease operations was based on legitimate business reasons unrelated to union activities. Required Evidence A. To meet this burden, the employer must present concrete evidence, which may include: Documented Financial Records : Demonstrating economic hardships, declining sales, or other financial metrics that necessitate cessation of operations. Strategic Business Plans : Showing that the decision aligns with long-term business strategies, such as restructuring or focusing on other markets, formulated prior to any union activity. Communications and Timelines : Providing records of internal communications and decision-making timelines that corroborate the employer's rationale for ceasing operations, established independently of the union election petition. Evidence of Imminent Cessation : The employer must demonstrate that plans to cease operations were imminent and not a reaction to the union election petition. This includes announcements of business closure to the public and employees, termination notices, or other definitive actions indicating a predetermined decision to cease operations. B. If your company needs assistance trying to get a union petition dismissed 30 days after the election petition is filed since you are going out of business, please contact H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates at 1-800-326-3046 
By Design Team February 11, 2025
February 10, 2025 How to Resolve an Employer’s Unfunded Pension Liability (UPL) 1 If an Employer has a union contract and either sells, goes out of business, or retires, it might have an unexpected unfunded pension liability (UPL) if they have a union defined benefit pension plan. 2. An Employer should write a letter to the Union pension plan a least one year in advance to determine if they have an UPL before they discontinue their Business. 3. If the Employer does have an UPL to the Pension Trust, it is best to resolve the UPL with a written settlement. There are many circumstances where an Employer MAY not have to pay his UPL. 4. The pension trust and Employer can enter into a settlement to reduce their UPL where the Employer can remit a lump sum payment to the Trust Fund for a reduced amount. 5. If the Employer cannot enter into a settlement to resolve their UPL then the parties can enter into a 20 Year Agreement to pay off their UPL. 6. If your company needs assistance in reducing your unfunded pension liability with your union, please contact H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates at 1-800-326-3046 Learn More
February 4, 2025
February 3, 2025 1. According to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), a union generally does NOT have a specific, mandatory notice period they must give to a private employer before going on strike, with the exception of healthcare institutions where at least10 days' written notice is required under Section 8(g) of the NLRA; meaning most private sector unions can strike without giving prior notice to the Employer. 2. However, if there is a strike between a union and an Employer, an Employer must prepare for the strike so the Employer can keep operating. 3. H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates has a checklist of 30 Steps an Employer must take to be prepared for a strike. 4. If your company needs assistance in negotiations or a strike with your union, please contact H. Sanford Rudnick & Associates at 1-800-326-3046